A veteran's entire claims file, in one place to review.

Open the full record, search every page, and annotate any document — in seconds.

Request a demo

Shown on a fully synthetic claims file — no real veteran data.

Eight years in continuous production
100,000+ appeals processed end to end
200+ active users reviewing appeals today
We are seeing the case file the way VA sees it. Precision on knowing what a document is and when it was received is very important.
Attorney, Bergmann & Moore

Across the appeals lifecycle

An appeals workflow has a shape.
We cover every stage of it.

  1. Intake VA-form-aware ingest of the claims file.
  2. Route Auto-distribute to the right reviewer.
  3. Review Reader and AI across every document.
  4. Decide Hearings, drafting, signed decisions.
  5. Dispatch Final decisions out, end-to-end audit trail.

The reader attorneys rely on every day

Open the whole file, instantly.

Hundreds to thousands of documents per appeal — opened and navigated with no wait, even on the largest files that stall other readers.

Find any document.

Search every page; sort and filter by receipt date, document type, or party.

Know what you're looking at.

Issues, exhibits, parties, and receipt dates — appeals concepts built in, not generic document tags retrofitted.

Work the evidence.

Annotate, highlight, and cross-reference in place — your notes stay with the record.

AI built to the requirements the Board describes

Consolidate the issues.

Reads the file and pulls every adjudicated issue into one unified list.

Flag what's relevant.

Surfaces the documents and pages that matter most for attorney and judge review.

Generate the tasks.

Scans new filings, identifies actionable ones, and creates the work each requires.

Group related records.

Associates attachments and supplements with their submission as a single record.

Intake and routing — the request lifecycle

Bring in a claims file.

Accept an unlabeled PDF or an upstream feed; auto-segment into typed, dated documents.

Route to the right reviewer.

Auto-distribute requests by rule; honor priority and Advanced-on-Docket ordering.

Work the queue.

Per-user assigned-work view; status updates as requests are opened; search and filter the queue.

Manage each request.

View and edit details, add notes, work the same request alongside teammates.

Reporting and audit

Every action, logged.

An append-only activity record across users, requests, and documents — queryable on demand.

Ad-hoc and standardized views.

Real-time dashboards on throughput, queues, and workload; ad-hoc queries against the same data.

Trace any decision.

Audit trail at the document and page level — who saw what, when, and what they did with it.

The platform underneath

Teams and permissions.

Role-based access, team membership, deactivation, and document-level permission scoping.

Integrations, not lock-in.

Open APIs and event ingest for VA systems and partners; documents and data move both ways.

One model for documents and data.

A single, audited record per appeal — searchable, exportable, and built for long-term retention.

Built by the people who built it the first time.

Adjudicate began as the open-source appeals reader. We're the only team that has continuously developed it since — productized over eight years, shaped by the attorneys who use it daily. It covers document review and evidence today, and it's built to extend across the Board's full appeals workflow, alongside whatever else VA selects. That product is appeals-shaped at the architecture — not retrofitted from generic eDiscovery.

You can buy a document reader. You can't buy eight years of attorney feedback.

See it on a real claims file.

A working product, in production today. Ask for a walkthrough.

Request a demo